<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: E-Junkie Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sitesthatsoar.com/wordpress/e-junkie-review-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sitesthatsoar.com/wordpress/e-junkie-review-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 12:56:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=8215</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley Karyl</title>
		<link>http://sitesthatsoar.com/wordpress/e-junkie-review-2/comment-page-1/#comment-491</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley Karyl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 12:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sitesthatsoar.com/wordpress/?p=379#comment-491</guid>
		<description>I have tried both but I definitely prefer e-junkie on balance. In strictly technical terms they both have their pros and cons and each seller has to decide which is important to them but as a company I find e-junkie far more responsive and customer friendly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have tried both but I definitely prefer e-junkie on balance. In strictly technical terms they both have their pros and cons and each seller has to decide which is important to them but as a company I find e-junkie far more responsive and customer friendly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
